logoxgvb
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 1580
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
Location: hdfttv
|
 Posted: Sat 2:00, 04 Dec 2010 Post subject: ugg boots billig Preferred construction project ev |
|
|
Evaluation of construction projects preferred choice of indicators
Internal rate of return can not be used (IRR) criteria than most alternatives, but can only use the difference between the internal rate of return (& IRR) method OPTION, selection criterion is: if & IRR ≥ (standard discount rate), the investment (present value) of a large program for gifted; if R ≤ i, then the choice of investment (present value) of a small program,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the program compared to the case can also be used to describe the figure Figure l, C point to A , B net present value of the intersection of two programs, at this point the present value of the two programs are equal, C point is the discount rate corresponding to the difference between the two programs internal rate of return (△ feet). It can be seen from the figure, when △ IRR> i0 time, NPV> NPVB, select the A program; When & mR NPV,, select the B program. We can see merit comparison. △ IRR and NPV compared with the alternatives and concluded with the consistency of Industrial Engineering Volume 5 ring a program comparing the difference between the internal rate of return (AmR) 4) the difference between the cash flow ratio (AB / C) the difference between the cash flow ratio method (AB / C) is also a difference between the comparative law method, which calculated the difference between the cash flow of the program of the present value of benefits and costs the present value of the ratio. When the ratio is greater than 1, indicating that the difference between the investment with economic rationality, the programs of large investment program for the small investment can bring more money into the satisfaction of incremental revenue, and you should choose to invest in large programs; otherwise choose to invest a small program to note that, with the IRR is similar to the present value of the benefits the program itself and the present value of the ratio of the cost of its own inherent nature, can not directly yield the present value of the present value of the ratio of cost to the merits. 3 selection of the best indicators of evaluation relative to the dynamic selection of the best evaluation, the static evaluation does not truly reflect the real construction project profit and loss situation, which can only be used as supplementary indicators of dynamic evaluation. Evaluation in the dynamic selection of the best, the annual value of law and the present value method can be directly compared between the programs, but for all absolute indicators (such as NPV, NAN, etc.), can use the difference between the preferred method, but the efficiency indicators (such as IRR) can only be preferred relative index. Therefore, the only correct choice for evaluation index system, to properly compare the pros and cons of construction projects to ask, to choose the most appropriate projects. References: [1 LIU Xiao-jun construction of a technical economics [M] Beijing: China Building Industry Press ,199839-65 [2] Jia Chunlin technical economics [M] Changsha: Central South T_, lk University Press, 19981 (} 0 - 175. [3] Ge Fong economic evaluation of building projects [J. Construction Economics, 1997, (12) :42-43 [4J Tour Damien Project financial evaluation of the intrinsic link between the choice of indicators and evaluation of Mining and Metallurgy, Central South ... University, 1994, (3) :14-18 \As China's modern logistics is in its infancy, compared with developed countries there is still a gap, in theory,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], no system. on a strong guiding practice not many books, but in practice the development of modern logistics enterprises or logistics companies need to have the guidance of professional logistics practice, with a strong practical, systematic, theoretical tool. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Mechanical T-way Logistics Engineering Branch and jointly organized by China Railway Publishing House prepared internally first \and get community support, logistics and any celebrities Expert Committee on the book for guidance and advice. \logistics management; III: Modern Logistics Technology and Equipment {IV, logistics systems and typical cases; Volume V: Logistics Standard Profile, terms the industry directory. \will 20O2 in the second half by the China Railway Publishing House Publishing House, for the logistics, warehousing, transportation,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], freight forwarding, distribution, management, software, information, logistics, equipment manufacturers, research institutes,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], universities, etc. in the logistics planning and design ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], research, operations, management, software development, equipment procurement and others} believe the \sub-sets), a second screening u
相关的主题文章：
rosetta stone for sale Large area diamond films op
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
